According to Apple lawsuit: Youtuber ProSser posts a new video

Despite a potentially costly legal procedure that Apple has strained against him, Youtuber John Proser continues with videos on the subject. For the weekend, he published an overview of the iPhone 17 Pro, in which various mockups or render recordings of the new models expected in September were also shown. However, the rumors listed therein are not new, it is more of a nicely illustrated summary the current speculation.

Short side blow against Apple

The render recordings at the beginning of the video look as if they would come from an Apple reclamation. The animation of a light blue iPhone 17 Pro, the look of which corresponds to the current rumor, also ends with a logo of the group. Then, however, it becomes clear that it is a film from Proser, because after 30 seconds the YouTuber appears in a studio recording.

ProSser does not take a position on the current Apple lawsuit and only goes into it on the side by side: An assumption that Apple could serve new comradeship, he overwrites with “speculation” and the sentence “Please do not sue or so”. The video also has a sponsor-a VPN provider. The call -fors are around 950,000 within three days. Since ProSser’s channel “FPT” itself only has 565,000 subscribers, this is decent.

Friend of an Apple employee

Apple had filed a lawsuit against ProSser in July. The accusation: Together with another person, Michael R., he is said to have illegally accessed a group of developers from the group, on which a preliminary version of iOS 26 ran. The YouTuber then published a video that described the new “Liquid Glass” look. The procedure that Apple Prosser and the other person accuses of a thriller sounds like a thriller: R. had a friend at Apple, the employee Ethan L. According to Apple, ProSser and R. are said to have agreed to access LS developer iPhone as soon as he was not present for a long time.

To do this, R. apparently got the pass code for the iPhone and also used location data to determine LS whereabouts. When L. was gone, R. gave access to the device and presented the new look via Facetime. He then had the design recreated as render shots. ProSser defended himself on X with the words that things “didn’t go on his side”. Apple demands compensation and possibly still held by ProSser from LS iPhone. The Apple employee himself was released because he is not said to have adhered to security measures. The lawsuit is, among other things, to embezzlement of business secrets and violates the US anti-hacking law Computer Frau and Abuse Act.